Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Cities Balk as Federal Law on Marijuana Is Enforced


  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • EMAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
ARCATA, Calif. — Faced with growing chaos in the state’s medicalmarijuana industry, this city in Northern California passed an ordinance in 2008 that meticulously detailed, over 11 pages, how the drug could be grown and sold here.
Ramin Rahimian for The New York Times
Medical marijuana at the Humboldt Patient Resource Center in Arcata, Calif. Officials in Arcata and other cities that have ordinances regulating the industry are now at odds with federal prosecutors, who began shuttering dispensaries in October.
Ramin Rahimian for The New York Times
Kevin Jodrey, center, with patients at the Humboldt Patient Resource Center in Arcata, Calif. City officials, wary of a federal crackdown on the medical marijuana industry, have delayed the center’s application.
Ramin Rahimian for The New York Times
An employee at the Humboldt Patient Resource Center in Arcata, Calif.
The New York Times
More than 500 dispensaries have closed in eight months.
Humboldt Medical Supply, a dispensary here in Humboldt County regarded as a law-abiding model that has given free cannabis to elderly patients, became the first to obtain a permit in 2010. The Sai Center, whose owner has a history of flouting city regulations and was described by the mayor as running his business “purely for profit,” was rejected last year.
Humboldt Medical quickly closed shop after federal prosecutors began shuttering hundreds of dispensaries in October in one of the biggest crackdowns on medical marijuana since its legalization in California in 1996. The Sai Center’s owner moved locations and has defied the authorities by continuing to operate, most recently out of his mother’s house. City officials, afraid of becoming targets themselves of the prosecutors, have suspended the applications of two other dispensaries that were expected to be approved.
“We feel the federal government’s actions have had a very negative effect,” said Mayor Michael Winkler. “We’re very upset with their actions.”
Like their counterparts in many other municipalities that have regulated medical marijuana on their own, Arcata officials say the federal offensive has brought renewed chaos to the medical marijuana industry. The federal authorities, their critics say, have indiscriminately targeted good and bad dispensaries, sometimes putting the best ones out of business. The crackdown, the critics say, has made it difficult for qualified Californians to obtain marijuana for medical use and is just pushing buyers into the black market.
Acting on federal law, which considers all possession and distribution of marijuana to be illegal, California’s fourUnited States attorneys, working with the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Internal Revenue Service, have shut down at least 500 dispensaries statewide in the last eight months by sending letters to operators, landlords and local officials, warning of criminal charges and the seizure of assets. The United States attorneys said the dispensaries were violating not only federal law but also state law, which requires operators to be primary caregivers to their customers and distribute marijuana only for medical purposes.
“We’re not concerned in prosecuting patients or people who are legitimate caregivers for ill people, who are in good faith complying with state law,” said Benjamin B. Wagner, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of California. “But we are concerned about large commercial operations that are generating huge amounts of money by selling marijuana in this essentially unregulated free-for-all that exists in California.”
Because of the lack of regulation, it is difficult to know precisely how many dispensaries have shut down or even how many were in operation before the start of the current crackdown. But figures provided by three of California’s four United States attorneys totaled more than 500: “dozens” in Mr. Wagner’s district; 217 in the Southern District, in San Diego; and more than 200 in the Central District, in Los Angeles. Officials in the three districts say they have succeeded in putting out of business more than 90 percent of the dispensaries they have identified so far.
Declining to release figures was the United States attorney for the Northern District. The district includes San Francisco and Oakland, the two cities that have led the fight against the current federal offensive, as well as Arcata and other municipalities long known for their tolerance of marijuana.
Dan Rush, an official at the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, said about 650 out of the 1,400 marijuana dispensaries that existed last October have ceased operating. The union represents between 600 and 800 members working in statewide dispensaries, he said.
Except for San Francisco and Oakland, the roughly 50 municipalities with medical marijuana ordinances have suspended the administration of dispensaries, said Kris Hermes, a spokesman for Americans for Safe Access, a group that promotes access to medical marijuana. Though federal authorities have periodically gone after dispensaries since California became the first state to legalize marijuana for medical use, Mr. Hermes described the current crackdown as “unprecedented” because of its “intensity” and because of the number of dispensaries closed and federal agencies involved.
Prosecutors denied that legitimate patients were being driven to illegal sellers.
“Most often the individuals who are visiting these places have obtained sham doctor recommendations for really no purpose other than to engage in the recreational use of marijuana,” Laura E. Duffy, the United States attorney for the Southern District, said of the dispensaries. “To the extent that blatant distribution of marijuana is not available in commercial businesses throughout California, certainly in this district, I think that’s a good thing.”
Here in Arcata — a city of 17,000 people in a region of the state known as the Emerald Triangle, where the illegal marijuana trade has long been tolerated and is a pillar of the local economy — government officials worried that counterparts in neighboring communities had received letters warning them against regulating the medical marijuana industry.
“They said they could prosecute city officials and staff,” said Larry Oetker, a city official who oversaw the regulations on the dispensaries. “That was a dramatic change.”
Under the ordinance here, the city approved the permit of Humboldt Medical Supply, an “exemplary” dispensary according to Mayor Winkler. Greg Allen, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union who represented the dispensary, said its staff included a nurse and rigorously screened customers to ensure that they had legitimate conditions that required treatment with marijuana.
By contrast, the city rejected the application of the Sai Center, which has violated city regulations, including advertising its services and letting customers mill around its premises. Its owner, Stephen Gasparas, exhibited “an extremely hostile attitude” at city hearings for his application, the mayor said.
“He was very contemptuous of any government regulation of this at all,” the mayor said. “He seemed really to be in it for the money. If he also had any commitments to patients, I wasn’t aware of that.”
But federal prosecutors sent warning letters to the owners of the two dispensaries, as well as their landlords, citing their proximity to a ballpark, city officials said. Humboldt Medical Supply, which had been struggling financially, ceased operating. But Mr. Gasparas moved five blocks away to a house owned by his mother and quickly resumed business.
On a recent afternoon, an employee was working out of a single room in the back of the blue, single-story house, sitting behind a large desk, surrounded by marijuana plants and three large safes. Through the employee, Mr. Gasparas declined to be interviewed.
The employee, who declined to give his name but said he was majoring in botany at Humboldt State University here, said the federal offensive was “all political.” The dispensary, he said, was helping the ill who would otherwise buy marijuana from “an unsafe source.” He said he himself first obtained a doctor’s approval to use medical marijuana because he had anxiety.
At the Humboldt Patient Resource Center, one of the two dispensaries whose application was delayed because of the federal crackdown, a steady stream of customers — young men but also middle-aged men and women — came in to buy various strains of marijuana, including those called Blue Dream, Lemon Diesel and Oh Sour Head, at $40 for an eighth of an ounce.
Mariellen Jurkovich, the dispensary’s director, said she had spent $200,000 to comply with the city’s marijuana ordinance. Federal prosecutors had not sent her a warning letter, but she remained worried.
“Even if I eventually get a permit from the city, I don’t think I’m protected as long as the federal law doesn’t change,” she said. “I don’t know who they’ll go after and why.”

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Medical marijuana: Study raises questions about clinics' link to crime


  • Email
    Share
Medical marijuana dispensaries
Medical marijuana dispensaries may not be linked to an increase in crime, according to a new studyby UCLA researchers. (Spencer Weiner / Los Angeles Times / June 7, 2012)
Medical marijuana dispensaries would seem to be natural targets for criminals. According to a leading theory of criminology, pot dispensaries have several key attributes that put them at risk:
-- They sell a product (marijuana) that is attractive to criminals.
-- They usually operate on a cash-only basis (a cash stash also tends to attract would-be thieves).
-- The clients of marijuana clinics carry cash (in order to purchase their medicine).
-- Many clients are frail due to their medical conditions and may not be able to fight off attackers.
In Europe, "hash clubs" and other drug dispensaries have developed a reputation as being "a breeding ground for criminal networks," according to a new study by two UCLAresearchers. And some recent headlines indicate that U.S. pot dispensaries may be on track to follow suit. A 2009 white paper from the California Police Chiefs Assn. made a pretty good case that they would:
"Marijuana dispensaries are commonly large money-making enterprises that will sell marijuana to most anyone. ... While the dispensaries will claim to receive only donations, no marijuana will change hands without an exchange of money. These operations have been tied to organized criminal gangs, foster large grow operations, and are often multi-million-dollar profit centers. Because they are repositories of valuable marijuana crops and large amounts of cash, several operators of dispensaries have been attacked and murdered by armed robbers both at their storefronts and homes, and such places have been regularly burglarized.”
The pair of researchers from UCLA's Luskin School of Public Affairs decided to see whether clinics in California (one of 17 states that has legalized medical marijuana, along with the District of Columbia) fit the European profile.
Nancy Kepple and Bridget Freisthler focused on Sacramento, where dispensaries operated for six years before local regulatory policies were put in place in 2010. The researchers mapped all 40 clinics in the city, figuring out whether they were in neighborhoods with many single-parent households, families living in poverty, vacant housing units, a high proportion of young men, easy access to a freeway on-ramp and other characteristics associated with crime.
Then they plugged in crime data from 2009 to see if there were any relationships between robberies, thefts and other acts of vice and the presence of drug dispensaries.
The models the researchers came up with confirmed that factors such as unemployment, commercial zoning and a high proportion of young adults were indeed associated with higher crime rates. But the number of marijuana clinics in a neighborhood had nothing to do with any of it, they found.
Writing up their results in the July issue of the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, however, the researchers didn't seem to be persuaded by their own results. They noted that one possibility is that "the density of medical marijuana dispensaries may not be associated with neighborhood-level crime rates," but they also theorized that the relationship "is likely more complex" than could be measured with the available data.
To make a convincing case that pot dispensaries really don’t contribute to crime, the outlets would need to be tracked in more cities for a longer period of time, they wrote.
You can read the study online here.
Return to the Booster Shots blog.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Medical pot not protected by disabilities act, 9th Circuit rules


By Maura Dolan / Los Angeles Times (MCT)
Tuesday, May 22, 2012 - 
EmailE-mail   PrintablePrint   Comments(1) Comments   LargerSmallerText size  Bookmark and Share Share   
LOS ANGELES — Medical marijuana patients cannot use a federal disabilitylaw to prevent cities from shutting down pot dispensaries, a federal appeals court decided Monday.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by severely disabled medical marijuana users against Costa Mesa and Lake Forest, Calif. The suit charged that the Orange County cities were violating the Americans With Disabilities Act by closing down dispensaries that distributed medical marijuana.
The court said the disabilities law does not protect patients who claim to face discrimination on the basis of medical marijuana use.
“We recognize that the federal government’s views on the wisdom of restricting medical marijuana use may be evolving,” wrote Judge Raymond C. Fisher. “But for now Congress has determined that, for purposes of federal law, marijuana is unacceptable for medical use.”
Fisher, a President Bill Clinton appointee, acknowledged that the suit was brought by “gravely ill” people and involved “not only their right to live comfortably, but also their basic human dignity.” He also noted that California has embraced medical marijuana as an effective treatment for patients with debilitating pain.
The patients who sued insisted that Congress’ decision not to interfere with a 2010 medical marijuana law in Washington, D.C., amounted to tacit approval of the drug. D.C. laws take effect only if Congress fails to pass a joint resolution of disapproval within 90 days.
But the 9th Circuit said Congress’ failure to disapprove the medical cannabis law did not amount to an endorsement.
Judge Marsha S. Berzon, also a Clinton appointee, said in a partial dissent that the disabilities law, while ambiguous, may be read to protect the rights of medical marijuana patients. “At the same time, it seems most likely that Congress did not intend the ADA to require the cities to permit marijuana dispensaries,” Berzon wrote.
Jeffrey V. Dunn, who represented Lake Forest in the case, said the nearly 40 dispensaries in the city have been shut down. “My take-away on this is no city or county or a state, for that matter, can enact laws or ordinances that conflict with federal law,” Dunn said.
Matthew Pappas, a lawyer for the medical marijuana patients, said he would ask a larger panel of the 9th Circuit to review the case. He called the majority ruling “incorrect” and complained that patients must now drive long distances to obtain their medicine.
___

Medical pot not protected by disabilities act, 9th Circuit rules


By Maura Dolan / Los Angeles Times (MCT)
Tuesday, May 22, 2012 - 
EmailE-mail   PrintablePrint   Comments(1) Comments   LargerSmallerText size  Bookmark and Share Share   
LOS ANGELES — Medical marijuana patients cannot use a federal disabilitylaw to prevent cities from shutting down pot dispensaries, a federal appeals court decided Monday.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by severely disabled medical marijuana users against Costa Mesa and Lake Forest, Calif. The suit charged that the Orange County cities were violating the Americans With Disabilities Act by closing down dispensaries that distributed medical marijuana.
The court said the disabilities law does not protect patients who claim to face discrimination on the basis of medical marijuana use.
“We recognize that the federal government’s views on the wisdom of restricting medical marijuana use may be evolving,” wrote Judge Raymond C. Fisher. “But for now Congress has determined that, for purposes of federal law, marijuana is unacceptable for medical use.”
Fisher, a President Bill Clinton appointee, acknowledged that the suit was brought by “gravely ill” people and involved “not only their right to live comfortably, but also their basic human dignity.” He also noted that California has embraced medical marijuana as an effective treatment for patients with debilitating pain.
The patients who sued insisted that Congress’ decision not to interfere with a 2010 medical marijuana law in Washington, D.C., amounted to tacit approval of the drug. D.C. laws take effect only if Congress fails to pass a joint resolution of disapproval within 90 days.
But the 9th Circuit said Congress’ failure to disapprove the medical cannabis law did not amount to an endorsement.
Judge Marsha S. Berzon, also a Clinton appointee, said in a partial dissent that the disabilities law, while ambiguous, may be read to protect the rights of medical marijuana patients. “At the same time, it seems most likely that Congress did not intend the ADA to require the cities to permit marijuana dispensaries,” Berzon wrote.
Jeffrey V. Dunn, who represented Lake Forest in the case, said the nearly 40 dispensaries in the city have been shut down. “My take-away on this is no city or county or a state, for that matter, can enact laws or ordinances that conflict with federal law,” Dunn said.
Matthew Pappas, a lawyer for the medical marijuana patients, said he would ask a larger panel of the 9th Circuit to review the case. He called the majority ruling “incorrect” and complained that patients must now drive long distances to obtain their medicine.
___

Friday, April 20, 2012

What's the 420, dude? America celebrates Pot Day


  • Share30
Pot day
University of Colorado Chancellor Phil DiStefano speaks with the media about a judge's ruling after a hearing regarding closure of the university's Norlin Quad. The judge said the university can close its grounds to unauthorized visitors Friday. (Jeremy Papasso / The Daily Camera/Associated Press /April 20, 2012)
Dude! Today is a day of special significance and the appointed hour is 4:20 p.m. What it all means is on the tip of the tongue. Literally.

Welcome to April 20, a day that has come to mean a celebration of marijuana and a protest against the fact that its use, sale and possession are crimes. From the narrow streets of New York’s Greenwich Village to the open expanse of San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, users will congregate to do their thing.

Perhaps the most notorious gathering will be at the University of Colorado-Boulder, where last year 10,000 people smoked at the same time. This year, the demonstration may be moved off-campus to avoid clashes with authorities. School officials have decided to close the campus to non-authorized visitors, the Associated Press reports, and were applying a smelly fertilizer to the quadrangle used for the demonstration.

Other protests are planned in Denver and Austin, Texas, where music legend and celebrated tokerWillie Nelson will unveil a statute of himself. Or maybe it will be the other way around.

The festivities are scheduled to start at 4:20 p.m. locally. (April 20 was picked because it's 4/20 – at least in the American shorthand.)  The number 420 has come to be connected to marijuana use, though exactly why is buried in the perfumed clouds of the past.

Among the current favorite theories is that the number honors a group of California teenagers who gathered in 1971 to find a lost marijuana crop (proving that treasure myths exist even in the counterculture, similar to the stories of El Dorado or the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow). Another theory holds that the number was a police code for drug usage; still another suggests it memorializes the perfect time to light up as the work day winds down and the evening begins with its hot promise.

Whatever the origin, the effect of the day is real, as demonstrations have continued in recent years with legalization a goal.

California in 1996 became the first state to legalize marijuana for medicinal use, though that definition can be awfully broad. (Just check out the Venice boardwalk on a golden day.) Sixteen states allow medical marijuana; two states -- Colorado and Washington -- are considering legalizing pot for recreational use.

The federal government has insisted that it will continue to enforce its anti-drug laws.

Just for the record, Pot Day is not the only numerical based commemoration. There is also Pi Day, March 14, in honor of the mathematical function valued at 3.14...