Saturday, March 31, 2012

D.C. picks six companies to grow medical marijuana


The District has selected six companies to grow marijuana and supply medical cannabis to users — clearing the way for growers to start producing hundreds of plants in as little as a month.
The Health Department is expected to announce Friday that it has selected the winning bidders for cultivating plants that will feed the dispensaries city officials hope to approve by the summer. All the growers will be in Northeast, including a company partly owned by celebrity talk show host Montel Williams.
More news about D.C. politics

Jim Graham backs Vincent Orange in at-large race

D.C. Council member Jim Graham (D) announced Friday that he’s supporting his colleague, Vincent B. Orange, in Tuesday’s Democratic primary for an at-large seat on the council.

Biddle launches red-eyed attack on Orange

Voters in Northwest received a mailer from at-large primary candidate Sekou Biddle that included a photograph of D.C. council member Vincent Orange with bloodshot eyes.

Orange, Biddle under fire at WAMU debate

In the final debate before Tuesday’s Democratic primary, D.C. council member Vincent Orange was repeatedly put on the defensive over ethical issues involving his colleagues.
Combined, they will be tasked with producing thousands of plants annually, in possible violation of federal law.
Two years ago, the D.C. Council voted to establish as many as 10 cultivation centers, where up to 95 marijuana plants could be grown at a time at each location. Once harvested, the marijuana will be sent to five distribution centers for patients to buy.
Mohammad N. Akhter, director of the Health Department, said he and a task force evaluated dozens of bidders before selecting the six applicants. Akhter said they were chosen based on their ability to grow “quality” marijuana “in a safe environment” that includes heavy security.
Akhter said he also tried to ensure that the cultivation centers were not too tightly clustered in the same blocks.
“I have taken every single step that I could to make sure this is done in a safe environment in which we can have a quality product that can meet the needs of the patient in a way that the community is also satisfied,” he said in an interview. “These are the best people who can do the best job.”
Williams’s cultivation center, Abatin Wellness Center, has been approved for the 2100 block of Queens Chapel Road in Langdon, according to a city list obtained by The Washington Post.
The department also selected Montana Apothecary dba Alternative Solutions in the 2100 block of 24th Place NE in Langdon; District Growers in the 2400 block of Evarts Street NE in Langdon; Holistic Remedies in 1800 block of Fenwick Street NE in Ivy City; Phyto Management in the 3700 block of Benning Road NE in Benning; and Venture Forth dba Center City in the 2200 block of Channing Street NE in Langdon.
Before the applicants can open, however, Akhter said they must apply for their business license and building permits from the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. He added that the permitting process may take less than two weeks, meaning the marijuana growers may be able to start production in less than a month.
But Helder Gil, a spokesman for DCRA, said it could take some providers longer to open if they plan to make major renovations, including additional electric or water supplies.
“If they are just doing minor stuff . . . they can get a building permit quickly and then come in and get the sign-off,” Gil said.
The Health Department does not expect to complete the approval process for dispensaries until June.
“It takes about 90 days to grow the plants and have them ready,” Akhter said. “By the time growers are ready with the plants, the dispensaries should be in operation.”

Medical marijuana initiatives filed in five cities


San Diego County remains only local government with rules allowing dispensaries

Amid a massive federal crackdown, medical marijuana dispensaries announced plans Friday to expand their efforts beyond the city of San Diego, proposing ballot initiatives in five local municipalities to regulate storefront operators and generate additional revenue through a sales tax.
The proposals — filed with Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach, Lemon Grove and La Mesa — would limit storefront dispensaries to commercial and industrial areas and levy a 2.5 percent tax on retail transactions. They also would allow cities to recover their expenses, establish security measures and hours of operation and require licensing by existing city departments.
San Diego County is the only local government with rules allowing dispensaries. Reaction from each of the five cities ranged from skepticism that proponents would have enough time to qualify a measure, to concerns with having storefront operators locating in their communities, to sympathy for patients in need of medicinal marijuana.
The proposed ballot measures largely mirror one planned for the city of San Diego. All are being coordinated by Citizens for Patient Rights in connection with the Patient Care Association, a trade organization of and for nonprofit dispensaries.
“Our organization has wanted to create safe access throughout as much of the county as possible,” James Schmachtenberger, chairman of the PCA, said Friday. “As we began collecting signatures for the initiative in San Diego, we saw the need of patients in outlying areas and we realized we were just under the deadline for when ballot measures would need to be turned in to qualify for the election in November.”
A separate group of medical marijuana supporters has launched a citizen-initiated petition to reverse a dispensary ban in Imperial Beach.
The efforts come about a month after the U.S. Attorney’s Office revealed that more than 200 medical marijuana collectives in San Diego and Imperial counties have closed since federal prosecutors announced enforcement actions aimed at growers and distributors in California. Many of the local closures were attributed to lawsuits and settlements involving the City Attorney’s Office in San Diego.
Critics of dispensaries say they are illegal and threaten neighborhood security.
Representatives from the trade association and its political action committee acknowledge that there’s little they could do to stem the flow of federal action because marijuana is illegal under U.S. law. However, they reiterated that changing regulations across the county was a critical aspect of their mission to provide access to medicinal cannabis while respecting community desires such as ensuring public safety, preventing diversion of the drug for recreational use and keeping collectives away from areas where children congregate.
The most significant differences between the ordinance proposed for San Diego and ones for the other cities is that accreditation would be handled by existing departments rather than a third-party. Cities also would have a 1,000-foot buffer between collectives.
Proponents noted that while they need 62,057 valid signatures from registered voters to qualify the measure for the November ballot in San Diego, the combined total for the other communities is estimated to be fewer than 10,000. In Del Mar, they would need about 320.
More
 1 2 Next

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

No Medical MJ on Campus Arizona legislators rule.

Medical marijuana ban for Arizona campuses approved

Medical_marijuana_20120218223531_JPG
Medical marijuana
Photographer: ABC15
Copyright 2012 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Advertisement
Posted: 5:00 PM
Last Updated: 1 hour and 10 minutes ago
PHOENIX - Arizona legislators have approved a bill to prohibit use or possession of medical marijuana at public universities, community colleges or child-care facilities.
A Senate vote of 28-2 Wednesday means the bill goes next to Gov. Jan Brewer.
Supporters included university officials and prosecutors, while the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona opposed the bill's prohibition for higher education institutions.
The House and Senate both approved the bill by the three-quarters votes needed because the legislation relates to a voter-approved law.
But an Arizona Medical Marijuana Association spokesman predicts that the new legislation will be challenged either by his group or somebody else on grounds that it violates a constitutional protection for voter-approved laws.
Association spokesman Joe Yuhas says the voter-approved medical marijuana 2010 law doesn't allow the new legislation's restrictions.


Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/state/medical-marijuana-ban-for-ariz-campuses-approved#ixzz1qTD35kXS